![]() ![]() “We succeeded somehow with a not so beautiful, yet real-time stitched map. In this they were not completely successful, but still happy with their results. They planned a hybrid approach of balancing on-board processing with off-board processing to use the strengths of each. AKAMAV stated that there is no plug-and-play solution for live mapping an outdoor area, so they focused on that and were confident they could pull a win over their competition. The entire after-action report is worth a read but in particular their approach for the live mapping of an outdoor area is interesting. The indoor mapping and pickup-and-release missions were handled by a modified 250mm racer using a 360 degree camera combined with Pix4D software. the indoor missions were 60mm Tiny Whoop quads for the starting, entering, and landing portions. #Kindle cloud reader audio companion pc PcFlight controller was a pixhawk with APM:Copter and an onboard companion PC for other tasks, plus other components as needed. Overall the less humans were involved, the better the team’s score.įor the outdoor missions, AKAMAV used two identical 550mm quads with 600g payloads. choosing to land on a moving versus stationary platform.) Human piloting was a permitted option for the indoor missions, but for the outdoor missions flight had to be autonomous. Multiple drones could be used but teams scored better the smaller the drones were, the more missions were done in a single flight, and the higher the difficulty of the challenges (i.e. find specific objects and move them to designated locations)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |